Jennevieve Rauso - Greenwood Rd, Springfield, Vermont. Zylee Bialik - Martin St, Springfield, Vermont. For example, there’s no lighting detail in what ultimately is only a silhouette image thus, the range of expression to be copied in the pose “idea” is very limited. Use This Reverse Phone Lookup for 802-885 (Springfield, Vermont) Phone Number. However, on Jthe case was tossed on a motion to dismiss, the court finding that the image, boiled down, consisted only of a human pose, and only if the two images are “virtual identical” could there be copyright infringement. _ (2014) ruled last year that it was never too late to sue for copyright only damages are limited to the last three years. But them the Supreme Court in Petrella v. With so much time having gone by, it seemed that the threat of a copyright infringement suit came and went. Rentmeester complained in 1987, but did not sue. Nike licensed the image for two years, but then in 1987 it created its own image of Jumpman. Jacobus Rentmeester shot the Jordan photo for Life magazine in 1984. Nike Inc. (DC Ore), the logo ended up on top, while the photo infringement claim was rejected. So which wins in a race to the rim? In the case of Rentmeester v. Brand Image and Visual Image Protection: Trademark law protects Nike’s famous Jumpman logo of Michael Jordan (above right), and copyright law protects the rights of the photographer who shot the photograph (above left) upon which the logo was based.